Wikipedia as a Research Source

Researched Argument Essay Prompt:Is Wikipedia a legitimate research source?Choose one of the thesis statements below, and complete it by filling in the blanks with your three reasons why:Wikipedia is a legitimate research source because ___, ___, ___.Wikipedia is not a legitimate research source because ___, ___, ___.Length Requirement:750-1000 words not including Work Cited, as counted by Microsoft Word on the bottom left-hand corner of the screen. Failure to meet the minimum requirement will be severely penalized. Three and a half to four pages, word-processed, double spaced, 12-point Times New Roman font is a good goal. Diction Requirements:This paper needs to be formal in nature, so first-person pronouns (I, me, my, mine, etc.) are NOT allowed. No second-person pronouns are allowed, either (you, your, etc.) because of a distracting shift in perspective. It is quite likely the audience was not a witness to the events surrounding the visuals. Contractions are also NOT allowed. Adhere strictly to proper grammar and mechanics.Word Processing Requirements:The body of the paper must be typed according to MLA Style guidelines, even though you have no sources for this paper. (These are the requirements found in the MLA Formatting Module (Content<MLA Formatting: How To Set Up Your Paper). The paper MUST be created in .doc, .docx, or .rtf format.Source Requirements:You MUST include 4 academic sources, one per body paragraph. Cite your pulled quotes and paraphrases parenthetically. Unintentional plagiarism is still plagiarism. Include a properly formatted MLA Works Cited page with entries.