Instructions Complete both parts of this assessment. Part 1: Analyze Your Approach to the Issue Describe your approach to constructing your email. · Describe possible causes for the caustic exchange depicted in the email chain. Consider possible core organizational issues. State any assumptions that you might need to make regarding the scenario to support your assertions. · Justify why your message would likely be effective. Consider content, tone, style, et cetera. · Explain your intent for how your message might impact future communications and actions among team members. Part 2: Write a Response Email Write an email that effectively addresses the email chain. It should: · Properly consider the audience, your position, and the circumstances. · Articulate a well-conceived solution to the problem. · Effectively end the thread completely and de-escalate the tension. · Send a message that this exchange was “sub-optimal.” Additional Requirements The assessment is expected to meet the following requirements: · Font: Times New Roman, 12 point. · Length: 4–5 pages, double spaced. Competencies Measured By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria: · Competency 1: Analyze business communication situations. o Describe possible causes for the caustic exchange depicted in the email chain. o Explain why a message would likely be effective. · Competency 2: Apply fundamental principles of organizational communication. o Write an email that meets specified criteria. · Competency 3: Analyze the interrelationships of communication within organizational systems. o Describe likely core organizational issues that were exposed by the original email. o Describes how a message might plausibly affect future communications and actions among team members. · Competency 5: Communicate effectively and professionally. o Convey clear meaning with grammar, usage, word choice, and mechanics.