Policy Evaluation

Program/policy evaluation is a valuable tool that can help strengthen the quality of programs/policies and improve outcomes for the populations they serve. Program/policy evaluation answers basic questions about program/policy effectiveness. It involves collecting and analyzing information about program/policy activities, characteristics, and outcomes. This information can be used to ultimately improve program services or policy initiatives.Nurses can play a very important role assessing program/policy evaluation for the same reasons that they can be so important to program/policy design. Nurses bring expertise and patient advocacy that can add significant insight and impact. In this Assignment, you will practice applying this expertise and insight by selecting an existing healthcare program or policy evaluation and reflecting on the criteria used to measure the effectiveness of the program/policy.To Prepare:•    Select an existing healthcare program or policy evaluation or choose one of interest to you.•    Review community, state, or federal policy evaluation and reflect on the criteria used to measure the effectiveness of the program or policy described.•   The Assignment: (2–3 pages)Based on the program or policy evaluation you selected, complete the Healthcare Program/Policy Evaluation Analysis Template. Be sure to address the following:•    Describe the healthcare program or policy outcomes.•    How was the success of the program or policy measured?•    How many people were reached by the program or policy selected?•    How much of an impact was realized with the program or policy selected?•    At what point in program implementation was the program or policy evaluation conducted?•    What data was used to conduct the program or policy evaluation?•    What specific information on unintended consequences was identified?•    What stakeholders were identified in the evaluation of the program or policy? Who would benefit most from the results and reporting of the program or policy evaluation? Be specific and provide examples.•    Did the program or policy meet the original intent and objectives? Why or why not?•    Would you recommend implementing this program or policy in your place of work? Why or why not?•    Identify at least two ways that you, as a nurse advocate, could become involved in evaluating a program or policyafter 1 year of implementation.Program/Policy EvaluationBased on the program or policy evaluation you seelcted, complete the Healthcare Program/Policy Evaluation AnResponse accurately and thoroughly explains in detail how the success of the program or policy was measured.Response clearly and accurately describes in detail how many people were reached by the program or policy and fully describes the impact of the program or policy.Response clearly and accurately indicates the point at which time the program or policy evaluation was conducted.    Points Range:28 (28.00%) – 31 (31.00%)Response accurately describes the healthcare program or policy outcomes.Response accurately explains how the success of the program or policy was measured.Response accurately describes how many people were reached by the program or policy and accurately describes the impact of the program or policy.Response accurately indicates the point at which time the program or policy evaluation was conducted.    Points Range:25 (25.00%) – 27 (27.00%)Description of the healthcare program or policy outcomes is inaccurate or incomplete.Explanation of how the success of the program or policy was measured is inaccurate or incomplete.Description of how many people were reached by the program or policy and the impact is vague or inaccurate.Response vaguely describes the point at which the program or policy evaluation was conducted.    Points Range:0 (0.00%) – 24 (24.00%)Description of the healthcare program or policy outcomes is inaccurate and incomplete, or is missing.Explanation of how the success of the program or policy was measured is inaccurate and incomplete, or is missing.Description of how many people were reached by the program or policy and the associated impacts is vague and inaccurate, or is missing.Response of the point at which time the program or policy was conducted is missing.Reporting of Program/Policy Evaluations·  What data was used to conduct the program or policy evaluation?·  What specific information on unintended consequences was identified?·  What stakeholders were identified in the evaluation of the program or policy? Who would benefit the most from the results and reporting of the program or policy evaluation? Be specific and provide examples.·  Did the program or policy meet the original intent and objectives? Why or why not?·  Would you recommend implementing this program or policy in your place of work? Why or why not?·  Identify at least two ways that you, as a nurse advocate, could become involved in evaluating a program or policy after 1 year of implementation.    Points Range:45 (45.00%) – 50 (50.00%)Response clearly and accurately identifies the data used to conduct the program or policy evaluation.Response clearly and thoroughly explains in detail specific information on outcomes and unintended consequences identified through the program or policy evaluation.Response clearly and accurately explains in detail the stakeholders involved in theprogram or policy evaluation.Response clearly and accurately explains in detail who would benefit most from the results and reporting of the program or policy evaluation.Response includes a thorough and accurate explanation of whether the program met the original intent and outcomes, including an accurate and detailed explanation of the reasons supporting why or why not.Response includes a thorough and accurate explanation of whether the program should be implemented, including an accurate and detailed explanation of the reasons supporting why or why not.    Points Range:40 (40.00%) – 44 (44.00%)Response accurately identifies the data used to conduct the program or policy evaluation.Response explains in detail specific information on outcomes and unintended consequences identified through the program or policy evaluation.Response explains in detail the stakeholders involved in the program or policy evaluation.Response explains who would benefit most from the results and reporting of the program or policy evaluation.Response includes an accurate explanation of whether the program met the original intent and outcomes, including an accurate explanation of the reasons supporting why or why not.Response includes an accurate explanation of whether the program should be implemented, including an accurate explanation of the reasons supporting why or why not.    Points Range:35 (35.00%) – 39 (39.00%)Response vaguely or inaccurately identifies the data used to conduct the program or policy evaluation.Explanation of specific information on outcomes and unintended consequences identified through the program or policy evaluation is vague or incomplete.Explanation of the stakeholders involved in the program or policy evaluation is vague or inaccurate.Explanation of who would benefit most from the results and reporting of the program or policy evaluation is vague or inaccurate.Explanation of whether the program/policy met the original intent and outcomes and the reasons why or why not is incomplete or inaccurateExplanation of whether the program or policy should be implemented, and the reasons why or why not, is incomplete or inaccurate.    Points Range:0 (0.00%) – 34 (34.00%)Identification of the data used to conduct the program or policy evaluation is vague and inaccurate, or is missing.Explanation of specific information on outcomes and unitended consequences identified through the program or policy evaluation is vague and incomplete, or is missing.Explanation of the stakeholders involved in the program or policy evaluation is vague and inaccurate, or is missing.Explanation of who would benefit most from the results and reporting of the program or policy evaluation is vague and inaccurate, or is missing.Explanation of whether the program or policy met the original intent and outcomes and the reasons why or why not is incomplete and inaccurate, or is missing.Explanation of whether the program or policy should be implemented, and the reasons why or why not, is incomplete and inaccurate, or is missing.Written Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization:Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused–neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria.    Points Range:5 (5.00%) – 5 (5.00%)Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided which delineates all required criteria.    Points Range:4 (4.00%) – 4 (4.00%)Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time.Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive.    Points Range:3.5 (3.50%) – 3.5 (3.50%)Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%- 79% of the time.Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic.    Points Range:0 (0.00%) – 3 (3.00%)Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time.No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was provided.Written Expression and Formatting – English writing standards:Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation    Points Range:5 (5.00%) – 5 (5.00%)Uses correct grammar,spelling, and punctuation with no errors.    Points Range:4 (4.00%) – 4 (4.00%)Contains a few (1-2)grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.    Points Range:3.5 (3.50%) – 3.5 (3.50%)Contains several (3-4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.    Points Range:0 (0.00%) – 3 (3.00%)Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.Written Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.    Points Range:5 (5.00%) – 5 (5.00%)Uses correct APA format with no errors.    Points Range:4 (4.00%) – 4 (4.00%)Contains a few (1-2) APA format errors.    Points Range:3.5 (3.50%) – 3.5 (3.50%)Contains several (3-4) APA format errors.    Points Range:0 (0.00%) – 3 (3.00%)Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors.Name:NURS_6050_Module05_Week10_Assignment_Rubric

Calculate the price
Make an order in advance and get the best price
Pages (550 words)
$0.00
*Price with a welcome 15% discount applied.
Pro tip: If you want to save more money and pay the lowest price, you need to set a more extended deadline.
We know how difficult it is to be a student these days. That's why our prices are one of the most affordable on the market, and there are no hidden fees.

Instead, we offer bonuses, discounts, and free services to make your experience outstanding.
How it works
Receive a 100% original paper that will pass Turnitin from a top essay writing service
step 1
Upload your instructions
Fill out the order form and provide paper details. You can even attach screenshots or add additional instructions later. If something is not clear or missing, the writer will contact you for clarification.
Pro service tips
How to get the most out of your experience with Assignments ABC
One writer throughout the entire course
If you like the writer, you can hire them again. Just copy & paste their ID on the order form ("Preferred Writer's ID" field). This way, your vocabulary will be uniform, and the writer will be aware of your needs.
The same paper from different writers
You can order essay or any other work from two different writers to choose the best one or give another version to a friend. This can be done through the add-on "Same paper from another writer."
Copy of sources used by the writer
Our college essay writers work with ScienceDirect and other databases. They can send you articles or materials used in PDF or through screenshots. Just tick the "Copy of sources" field on the order form.
Testimonials
See why 10k+ students have chosen us as their sole writing assistance provider
Check out the latest reviews and opinions submitted by real customers worldwide and make an informed decision.
Mathematics
Job WELL DONE! Thank You very much!!
Customer 452483, July 12th, 2021
Nursing
Good job! Thank you.
Customer 452487, October 26th, 2021
Biology (and other Life Sciences)
Power Point Presentation was great, appreciate all of your hard work. Thank you!
Customer 452483, August 9th, 2021
Education
Great good
Customer 452555, February 14th, 2022
Nursing
Good job! Thank you
Customer 452487, October 17th, 2021
Healthcare Writing & Communications
Perfect! Thank you so much for all of your help!
Customer 452483, October 31st, 2021
Microbiology
Thank you so much! I appreciate what you do and all of the great help you've given me!
Customer 452483, September 6th, 2021
Classic English Literature
Great paper, thank you!
Customer 452591, May 5th, 2022
Psychology
Thank you for all of your help and hard work, truly appreciate you guys always being there with my hectic schedule. Thank you again!
Customer 452483, September 20th, 2021
English 101
na
Customer 452547, March 22nd, 2022
Psychology
On point! Appreciate all the hard work!!
Customer 452483, August 16th, 2021
Sociology
Thank you so much! Appreciate it!
Customer 452483, November 8th, 2021
1159
Customer reviews in total
96%
Current satisfaction rate
2 pages
Average paper length
47%
Customers referred by a friend
OUR GIFT TO YOU
15% OFF your first order
Use a coupon ABC15 and enjoy expert help with any task at the most affordable price.
Claim my 15% OFF Order in Chat
Open chat
Chat with us Live Here
Get in Touch with Our Live Chat Agents via WhatsApp on +1(346) 416-0954. Get Unlimited Access to Answers on Any Queries With Your Paper.