Benchmark: Picot Statement Final

Want create site? With you can do it easy.

Benchmark: Picot Statement Final

Benchmark: Picot Statement Final

Permalink:

FOLLOW EVERY INSTRUCTION.. YOU HAVE TO USE THE DOCUMENTS ATTACHED BELLOW TO ANSWER THE SSIGMENT.. USE RUBRICS TO ANSWER THE ASSIGMENT..HAS TO BE FREE OF PLAGIARISM.

 

Details:

Prepare this assignment as a 1,500-1,750 word paper using the instructor feedback from the Topic 1, 2, and 3 assignments and the guidelines below.

PICOT Statement 

Revise the PICOT statement you wrote in the Topic 1 assignment.

The final PICOT statement will provide a framework for your capstone project (the project students must complete during their final course in the RN-BSN program of study).

Research Critiques

In the Topic 2 and Topic 3 assignments you completed a qualitative and quantitative research critique. Use the feedback you received from your instructor on these assignments to finalize the critical analysis of the study by making appropriate revisions.

The completed analysis should connect to your identified practice problem of interest that is the basis for your PICOT statement.

Refer to “Research Critique Guidelines.” Questions under each heading should be addressed as a narrative in the structure of a formal paper.

Proposed Evidence-Based Practice Change

Discuss the link between the PICOT statement, the research articles, and the nursing practice problem you identified. Include relevant details and supporting explanation and use that information to propose evidence-based practice changes.

Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.

Research Critiques and PICOT Statement Final Draft – Rubric

Rubric Criteria

Total 260 points

Criterion

1. 1: Unsatisfactory

2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

3. 3: Satisfactory

4. 4: Good

5. 5: Excellent

Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)

Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)

0 points

Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.

9.75 points

Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent.

10.79 points

Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.

12.22 points

Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style.

13 points

All format elements are correct.

Proposed Evidence-Based Practice Change

Proposed Evidence-Based Practice Change

0 points

The proposed evidence-based practice change is not included.

19.5 points

The proposed evidence-based practice change is incomplete or incorrect.

21.58 points

The proposed evidence-based practice change is included but lacks supporting explanation and relevant details.

24.44 points

The proposed evidence-based practice change is complete and includes supporting explanation and relevant details.

26 points

The proposed evidence-based practice change is extremely thorough and includes substantial supporting explanation and numerous relevant details.

Method of Studies

Method of Studies

0 points

Discussion of method of studies, including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework, is incomplete.

9.75 points

Discussion of method of studies, including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework, is included but lacks relevant details and explanation.

10.79 points

Discussion of method of studies, including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework, is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation.

12.22 points

Discussion of method of studies, including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework, is complete and includes relevant details and explanation.

13 points

Discussion of method of studies, including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework, is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation.

Documentation of Sources

Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)

0 points

Sources are not documented.

9.75 points

Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.

10.79 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.

12.22 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.

13 points

Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.

Conclusion

Conclusion

0 points

Conclusion does not summarize a critical appraisal and applicability of findings.

9.75 points

Conclusion is vague and does not discuss importance to nursing.

10.79 points

Conclusion summarizes utility of the research and importance to nursing practice.

12.22 points

Conclusion summarizes utility of the research from the critical appraisal and the importance of the findings to nursing practice.

13 points

Conclusion summarizes utility of the research from the critical appraisal, knowledge learned, and the importance of the findings to nursing practice.

Results of Studies

Results of Studies

0 points

Discussion of studies results, including findings and implications for nursing practice, is incomplete.

9.75 points

Discussion of studies results, including findings and implications for nursing practice, is included but lacks relevant details and explanation.

10.79 points

Discussion of studies results, including findings and implications for nursing practice, is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation.

12.22 points

Discussion of studies results, including findings and implications for nursing practice, is complete and includes relevant details and explanation.

13 points

Discussion of studies results, including findings and implications for nursing practice, is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation.

Evidence of Revision

Evidence of Revision

0 points

Final paper does not demonstrate incorporation of feedback or evidence of revision on research critiques.

19.5 points

Incorporation of research critique feedback or evidence of revision is incomplete.

21.58 points

Incorporation of research critique feedback and evidence of revision are present.

24.44 points

Evidence of incorporation of research critique feedback and revision is clearly provided.

26 points

Evidence of incorporation of research critique feedback and revision is comprehensive and thoroughly developed.

Background of Studies

Background of Studies

0 points

Background of studies, including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is incomplete.

9.75 points

Background of studies, including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is included but lacks relevant details and explanation.

10.79 points

Background of studies, including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation.

12.22 points

Background of studies, including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is complete and includes relevant details and explanation.

13 points

Background of studies, including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation.

Ethical Considerations

Ethical Considerations

0 points

Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the conduct of nursing research is incomplete.

9.75 points

Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the conduct of nursing research is included but lacks relevant details and explanation.

10.79 points

Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the conduct of nursing research is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation.

12.22 points

Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the conduct of nursing research is complete and includes relevant details and explanation.

13 points

Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the conduct of nursing research is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation.

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

0 points

Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.

19.5 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, or word choice are present.

21.58 points

Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used.

24.44 points

Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used.

26 points

Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

Argument Logic and Construction

Argument Logic and Construction

0 points

Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.

19.5 points

Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.

21.58 points

Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.

24.44 points

Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.

26 points

Argument is clear and convincing and presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.

PICOT Question, Research Articles, and Nursing Practice Problem Relationship

PICOT Question, Research Articles, and Nursing Practice Problem Relationship

0 points

Discussion of the relationship between the PICOT question, research articles, and nursing practice problem is not included.

19.5 points

Discussion of the relationship between the PICOT question, research articles, and nursing practice problem is incomplete or incorrect.

21.58 points

Discussion of the relationship between the PICOT question, research articles, and nursing practice problem is included but lacks relevant details and supporting explanation.

24.44 points

Discussion of the relationship between the PICOT question, research articles, and nursing practice problem is complete and includes relevant details and supporting explanation.

26 points

Discussion of the relationship between the PICOT question, research articles, and nursing practice problem is extremely thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive supporting explanation.

Thesis Development and Purpose

Thesis Development and Purpose

0 points

Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.

19.5 points

Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.

21.58 points

Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.

24.44 points

Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.

26 points

Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.

Nursing Practice Problem and PICOT Question

Nursing Practice Problem and PICOT Question

0 points

A nursing practice problem is not clearly described or a PICOT question is not included.

9.75 points

PICOT question describes a nursing practice problem but lacks reliable sources.

10.79 points

PICOT question describes a nursing practice problem and includes a few reliable sources.

12.22 points

PICOT question articulates a nursing practice problem using supporting information from reliable sources.

13 points

PICOT question clearly articulates a nursing practice problem using substantial supporting information from numerous reliable sources.

 

                                                 RUBRICS

 

 

Benchmark – Research Critiques and PICOT Statement Final Draft

1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%
2
Less than Satisfactory
75.00%
3
Satisfactory
83.00%
4
Good
94.00%
5
Excellent
100.00%
60.0 %Content
5.0 % Nursing Practice Problem and PICOT Statement
A nursing practice problem is not clearly described and/or a PICOT statement is not included.
PICOT statement describes a nursing practice problem but lacks reliable sources.
PICOT statement describes a nursing practice problem and includes a few reliable sources.
PICOT statement articulates a nursing practice problem using supporting information from reliable sources.
PICOT statement clearly articulates a nursing practice problem using substantial supporting information from numerous reliable sources.
5.0 % Background of Study
Background of study including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions is incomplete.
Background of study including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions is included but lacks relevant details and explanation.
Background of study including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation.
Background of study including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions is complete and includes relevant details and explanation.
Background of study including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation.
5.0 % Method of Study
Discussion of method of study including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework is incomplete.
Discussion of method of study including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework is included but lacks relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of method of study including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of method of study including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework is complete and includes relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of method of study including discussion of conceptual/theoretical framework is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation.
5.0 % Results of Study
Discussion of study results including findings and implications for nursing practice is incomplete.
Discussion of study results including findings and implications for nursing practice is included but lacks relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of study results including findings and implications for nursing practice is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of study results including findings and implications for nursing practice is complete and includes relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of study results including findings and implications for nursing practice is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation.
5.0 % Ethical Considerations
Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the conduct of nursing research is incomplete.
Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the conduct of nursing research is included but lacks relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the conduct of nursing research is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the conduct of nursing research is complete and includes relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the conduct of nursing research is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation.
5.0 % Conclusion
Conclusion does not summarize a critical appraisal and applicability of findings.
Conclusion is vague and does not discuss importance to nursing.
Conclusion summarizes utility of the research and importance to nursing practice.
Conclusion summarizes utility of the research from the critical appraisal and the findings importance to nursing practice.
Conclusion summarizes utility of the research from the critical appraisal, knowledge learned, and the importance of the findings to nursing practice.
10.0 % Evidence of Revision
Final paper does not demonstrate incorporation of feedback or evidence of revision on research critiques.
Incorporation of research critique feedback or evidence of revision is incomplete.
Incorporation of research critique feedback and evidence of revision are present.
Evidence of incorporation of research critique feedback and revision is clearly provided.
Evidence of incorporation of research critique feedback and revision is comprehensive and thoroughly developed.
10.0 % PICOT Statement, Research Article, and Nursing Practice Problem Link (C. 2.2)
Discussion of the link between the PICOT statement, research articles, and nursing practice problem is not included.
Discussion of the link between the PICOT statement, research articles, and nursing practice problem is incomplete or incorrect.
Discussion of the link between the PICOT statement, research articles, and nursing practice problem is included but lacks relevant details and supporting explanation.
Discussion of the link between the PICOT statement, research articles, and nursing practice problem is complete and includes relevant details and supporting explanation.
Discussion of the link between the PICOT statement, research articles, and nursing practice problem is extremely thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive supporting explanation.
10.0 % Proposed Evidence-Based Practice Change (C. 3.2)
The proposed evidence-based practice change is not included.
The proposed evidence-based practice change is incomplete or incorrect.
Discussion of the link between the PICOT statement, research articles, and nursing practice problem is included but lacks relevant details and supporting explanation. The proposed evidence-based practice change is included but lacks supporting explanation and relevant details.
The proposed evidence-based practice change is complete and includes supporting explanation and relevant details.
The proposed evidence-based practice change is extremely thorough and includes substantial supporting explanation and numerous relevant details.
30.0 %Organization and Effectiveness
10.0 % Thesis Development and Purpose
Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.
Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.
Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.
Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.
Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
10.0 % Argument Logic and Construction
Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.
Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.
Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.
Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.
Argument is clear and convincing and presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.
10.0 % Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, or word choice are present.
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used.
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used.
Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
10.0 %Format
5.0 % Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)
Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.
Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent.
Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.
Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style.
All format elements are correct.
5.0 % Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)
Sources are not documented.
Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.
Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.
100 % Total Weightage
Did you find apk for android? You can find new and apps.

Calculate the price
Make an order in advance and get the best price
Pages (550 words)
$0.00
*Price with a welcome 15% discount applied.
Pro tip: If you want to save more money and pay the lowest price, you need to set a more extended deadline.
We know how difficult it is to be a student these days. That's why our prices are one of the most affordable on the market, and there are no hidden fees.

Instead, we offer bonuses, discounts, and free services to make your experience outstanding.
How it works
Receive a 100% original paper that will pass Turnitin from a top essay writing service
step 1
Upload your instructions
Fill out the order form and provide paper details. You can even attach screenshots or add additional instructions later. If something is not clear or missing, the writer will contact you for clarification.
Pro service tips
How to get the most out of your experience with Assignments ABC
One writer throughout the entire course
If you like the writer, you can hire them again. Just copy & paste their ID on the order form ("Preferred Writer's ID" field). This way, your vocabulary will be uniform, and the writer will be aware of your needs.
The same paper from different writers
You can order essay or any other work from two different writers to choose the best one or give another version to a friend. This can be done through the add-on "Same paper from another writer."
Copy of sources used by the writer
Our college essay writers work with ScienceDirect and other databases. They can send you articles or materials used in PDF or through screenshots. Just tick the "Copy of sources" field on the order form.
Testimonials
See why 10k+ students have chosen us as their sole writing assistance provider
Check out the latest reviews and opinions submitted by real customers worldwide and make an informed decision.
Nursing
Excellent!!! Thank you.
Customer 452487, September 13th, 2021
Communications
EXCELLENT JOB!!! VERY PLEASED :)
Customer 452483, July 5th, 2021
Psychology
Thank you so much for all of your hard work, appreciate every bit of it!
Customer 452483, September 6th, 2021
Microbiology
Perfect! Thank you guys for all of your great help! :)
Customer 452483, August 23rd, 2021
Sociology
Perfect! Appreciate all of your help! Thank you so much!
Customer 452483, November 14th, 2021
Other
I appreciate the help.
Customer 452567, March 18th, 2022
Communications
Thank you so much!
Customer 452461, June 23rd, 2021
English 101
I would like to thank you for the writing, it was a very busy week for me and had no time this week to do a writing. I would recommend you to others and would utilize you again.
Customer 452639, October 16th, 2022
English 101
na
Customer 452547, March 22nd, 2022
Psychology
Thank you for all of your help and hard work, truly appreciate you guys always being there with my hectic schedule. Thank you again!
Customer 452483, September 20th, 2021
Communications
Well done! I thank you very much!
Customer 452483, July 9th, 2021
Nursing
Good job. Thank you
Customer 452487, September 16th, 2021
1159
Customer reviews in total
96%
Current satisfaction rate
2 pages
Average paper length
47%
Customers referred by a friend
OUR GIFT TO YOU
15% OFF your first order
Use a coupon ABC15 and enjoy expert help with any task at the most affordable price.
Claim my 15% OFF Order in Chat