4-Evidence Based Practice (EBP) is a problem-solving approach to

4-Evidence Based Practice (EBP) is a problem-solving approach to clinical decision-making within a health care organization. It integrates the best available scientific evidence with the best available experiential (patient and practitioner) evidence. EBP considers internal and external influences on practice and encourages critical thinking in the judicious application of such evidence to the care of individual patients, a patient population, or a system. The level of evidence are as follows: Level I  Experimental study, randomized controlled trial (RCT) Systematic review of RCTs, with or without meta-analysis Level II  Quasi-experimental Study Systematic review of a combination of RCTs and quasi-experimental, or quasi-experimental studies only, with or without meta-analysis. Level III  Non-experimental study Systematic review of a combination of RCTs, quasi-experimental and non-experimental, or non-experimental studies only, with or without meta-analysis. Qualitative study or systematic review, with or without meta-analysis Level IV Opinion of respected authorities and/or nationally recognized expert committees/consensus panels based on scientific evidence.     Includes:          – Clinical practice guidelines          – Consensus panels Level V  Based on experiential and non-research evidence.     Includes:       – Literature reviews       – Quality improvement, program or financial evaluation       – Case reports       – Opinion of nationally recognized expert(s) based on experiential evidence. According to U.S Department of Health and Human services, Evidence Classification Scheme for a Diagnostic Measure include: Class I: A prospective study in a broad spectrum of persons with the suspected condition, using a ‘gold standard’ for case definition, where the test is applied in a blinded evaluation, and enabling the assessment of appropriate tests of diagnostic accuracy Class II: A prospective study of a narrow spectrum of persons with the suspected condition, or a well-designed retrospective study of a broad spectrum of persons with an established condition (by ‘gold standard’) compared to a broad spectrum of controls, where test is applied in a blinded evaluation, and enabling the assessment of appropriate tests of diagnostic accuracy Class III: Evidence provided by a retrospective study where either person with the established condition or controls are of a narrow spectrum, and where test is applied in a blinded evaluation Class IV: Any design where test is not applied in blinded evaluation OR evidence provided by expert opinion alone or in descriptive case series (without controls). References Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. (n.d.). Agency for healthcare research and quality: a profile. Retrieved December 3, 2018, from https://www.ahrq.gov/cpi/about/profile/index.html Winona State University. (2018). Evidence based practice toolkit. Retrieved December 3, 2018, from https://libguides.winona.edu/ebptoolkit       5-Evidence based medicine uses evidence to make clinical decisions. There is a hierarchal system for classification of evidence. This hierarchy is known as the levels of evidence. Physicians are encouraged to find the highest level of evidence to answer clinical questions (Barnes, Rohrich, & Chung, 2012, p. 305). The higher the level the more strength the evidence has. Randomized controlled trials (RCT’s) are the strongest research designs for treatment or intervention studies because they exert the most control over the methods and the results are considered more trustworthy (Thomas, 2017). It is important to note that a high level of evidence for a treatment study may not be the highest level of evidence for a study for prognosis. The strongest levels of evidence are at the top of the hierarchy. Some examples put concepts into  practice from the different levels of evidence that may include practice alerts for revising current policies and instituting new practices. Meta-Analysis  A      systematic review that uses quantitative methods to summarize the results. Systematic      Review         An article in which the authors have systematically searched for,      appraised, and summarized all the medical literature for a specific topic. Critically      Appraised Topic          Authors of critically-appraised topics evaluate and synthesize multiple      research studies. Critically      Appraised Articles  Authors of      critically-appraised individual articles evaluate and synopsize individual      research studies. Randomized      Controlled Trials  RCT’s include a randomized      group of patients in an experimental group and a control group. These      groups are followed up for the variables/outcomes of interest. Cohort      Study       Identifies two groups (cohorts) of patients, one which did receive the      exposure of interest, and one which did not, and following these cohorts      forward for the outcome of interest. Case-Control      Study       Involves identifying patients who have the outcome of interest (cases) and      control patients without the same outcome and looking to see if they had the      exposure of interest. Background      Information / Expert Opinion   Handbooks,      encyclopedias, and textbooks often provide a good foundation or      introduction and often include generalized information about a      condition.  While background information presents a convenient      summary, often it takes about three years for this type of literature to      be published. Animal      Research / Lab Studies  Information begins at the      bottom of the pyramid: this is where ideas and laboratory      research takes place. Ideas turn into therapies and diagnostic tools,      which then are tested with lab models and References Barnes, P. B., Rohrich, R. J., & Chung, K. C. (2012, July 1). The Levels of Evidence and their role in Evidence-Based Medicine. Plastic Reconstructive Surgery, 128(1), 305-310. https://doi.org/doi:  [10.1097/PRS.0b013e318219c171] Thomas, C. J. (2017, May 23). What Does “Levels of Evidence” Mean in Evidence-Based Practice? Nursing Education Expert. Retrieved from https://nursingeducationexpert.com/levels-of-evidence/   6-In attempting to prove the accuracy of a case study or other investigation, various levels of evidence are utilized in associating well reputed and accurate sources and data collection methods (Petrisor & Bhandari, 2007). These evaluations grade the overall validity of the study, and help to show whether or not the evidence is accurate in its findings (Petrisor & Bhandari, 2007). These levels of evidence are generally seen on seven levels, with the first being the most valid and the seventh being the least valid. The first level is gathered through a systematic review of randomized control trials (RCT), and due to the wide range of its data is the most accurate and can be used as a basis for broad changes in practice methods (Burns, Rohlich & Chung, 2011). The second level is gathered through a single RCT that could be applied to a wide range of practice changes, such as determining intervention method effectiveness (Darrell W. Krueger Library, 2018). The third level of evidence is similar to the second, but the participants to groups are not assigned randomly. This form of evidence can be used in detecting extraneous variables in a study by examining a particular factor (DWKL, 2018).            The fourth level of evidence consists of cohort and case-control studies which compare two different outcomes between similar studies retrospectively, such as those with and without a disease to determine outcomes. The fifth and sixth levels relate to descriptive and non-quantitative studies, with the fifth level examining numerous studies, and the sixth only examines one (DWKL, 2018). These studies can be used to describe personal experiences. The final level of evidence is based off of expert opinions, which are worth exploring for new ideas, but not scientifically valid (DWKL, 2018). References Burns, P. B., Rohrich, R. J., & Chung, K. C. (2011). The levels of evidence and their role in evidence-based medicine. Evidence-based Medicine Toolkit, 128(1), 94-96. doi:10.1002/9780470750605.ch15 Darrell W. Krueger Library. (2018, September 18). Evidence based practice toolkit. Retrieved from https://libguides.winona.edu/c.php?g=11614&p=61584 Petrisor, B. A., & Bhandari, M. (2007). The hierarchy of evidence: Levels and grades of recommendation. Retrieved from www.unm.edu/~unmvclib/cascade/handouts/PICOTpyramidofevidence.pdf

Calculate the price
Make an order in advance and get the best price
Pages (550 words)
$0.00
*Price with a welcome 15% discount applied.
Pro tip: If you want to save more money and pay the lowest price, you need to set a more extended deadline.
We know how difficult it is to be a student these days. That's why our prices are one of the most affordable on the market, and there are no hidden fees.

Instead, we offer bonuses, discounts, and free services to make your experience outstanding.
How it works
Receive a 100% original paper that will pass Turnitin from a top essay writing service
step 1
Upload your instructions
Fill out the order form and provide paper details. You can even attach screenshots or add additional instructions later. If something is not clear or missing, the writer will contact you for clarification.
Pro service tips
How to get the most out of your experience with Assignments ABC
One writer throughout the entire course
If you like the writer, you can hire them again. Just copy & paste their ID on the order form ("Preferred Writer's ID" field). This way, your vocabulary will be uniform, and the writer will be aware of your needs.
The same paper from different writers
You can order essay or any other work from two different writers to choose the best one or give another version to a friend. This can be done through the add-on "Same paper from another writer."
Copy of sources used by the writer
Our college essay writers work with ScienceDirect and other databases. They can send you articles or materials used in PDF or through screenshots. Just tick the "Copy of sources" field on the order form.
Testimonials
See why 10k+ students have chosen us as their sole writing assistance provider
Check out the latest reviews and opinions submitted by real customers worldwide and make an informed decision.
Communications
You're awesome! Thank you so much!
Customer 452483, July 27th, 2021
Communications
Thank you! It was great :)
Customer 452483, July 26th, 2021
Psychology
Thank you for all of your help and hard work, truly appreciate you guys always being there with my hectic schedule. Thank you again!
Customer 452483, September 20th, 2021
Mathematics
PERFECT! Thanks a million, you're all awesome!!!!
Customer 452483, July 7th, 2021
Group Dynamics
Great job. I appreciate it.
Customer 452521, November 22nd, 2021
Education
Great good
Customer 452555, February 14th, 2022
Classic English Literature
Great paper, thank you!
Customer 452591, May 5th, 2022
Nursing
Excellent!!! Thank you.
Customer 452487, September 13th, 2021
English 101
Perfect! Very informative! Appreciate all of your hard work! Thank you very much.
Customer 452483, September 22nd, 2021
Other
I appreciate the help.
Customer 452567, March 18th, 2022
Education
Thank you for your help
Customer 452555, February 16th, 2022
Healthcare Writing & Communications
You guys are awesome! Appreciate all of your hard work! Thank you.
Customer 452483, October 15th, 2021
1159
Customer reviews in total
96%
Current satisfaction rate
2 pages
Average paper length
47%
Customers referred by a friend
OUR GIFT TO YOU
15% OFF your first order
Use a coupon ABC15 and enjoy expert help with any task at the most affordable price.
Claim my 15% OFF Order in Chat
Open chat
Chat with us Live Here
Get in Touch with Our Live Chat Agents via WhatsApp on +1(346) 416-0954. Get Unlimited Access to Answers on Any Queries With Your Paper.